Most lawyers undertake their work and legal practices.

Most
of the therapeutic jurisprudence work are related to courts and the techniques
and approaches used have significant involvement with the law as it affects the
way judges and lawyers undertake their work and legal practices. The
traditional focus when training lawyers and members of the judiciary has been
on knowledge and application of the law and skills in fact-finding. However key
non-adversarial approaches suggest that emotional intelligence and
interpersonal skills are also important skills to have when working together
cooperatively to reach the best solution for everyone. This will allow for a
win-win situation.

Singapore’s
Court are made up of two main types of courts and they are State Courts and
Supreme Court. They cater to different types of proceedings such as the
District & Magistrate Courts, Family Courts, Coroner’s Court, Juvenile
Court, Community Court and Small Claims Tribunal which are under the State
Courts. Under the Supreme Court they have the High Court, Court of Appeal and
Civil cases. For the party involved in any proceedings there may be a number of
important issues such as the legal problem’s effect on emotional wellbeing,
mental health, finances and personal relationships. However there may be underlying
problems that have contributed to the legal problem such as family dysfunction,
conflict between business partners or neighbours, substance abuse or financial
distress. The resolution of the party’s problem may require addressing these
other underlying problems on top of the legal problems.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Court
processes consist of fact-finding, determining the law, applying the law to the
facts through rules of evidence, court procedure and statutory interpretation.
These are crucial to a court’s proper functioning but the emotional implications are not
considered in the process. However we can’t deduce that the courts are devoid
of any emotion. For example, courts allow a short
adjournment for distressed witnesses to compose themselves and refer to victim
impact statements to ascertain a crime’s emotional effects on victims when
sentencing. Some judicial officers take a more personable approach to judging
by virtue of their personality or past experiences. However, these are
exceptions. Judicial officers and lawyers have not systematically taken into
account the emotional effects of legal processes.