How burden on NHS staff. Although the 2016

How Many of people have visited the A&E for
non-life threatening ailment such as cough, flu and etc. and after the visit
felt like they could have  gotten the
same solution from the GP? People ought to be charged for attending A&E
with non-life threatening ailment because it cost the NHS more money and it
adds a lot of strains to the staff working at the A&E which in turn can
cost more staff to be over worked. The NHS provider (2017) states that trying
to reach performance targets on inadequate funding levels is also placing a progressively
unsustainable burden on NHS staff. Although the 2016 NHS staff survey showed an
overall increase in staff engagement it also showed that only 30% of staff
agreed that “there are enough staff at this organisation for me to do my job
properly”, with 47% disagreeing. 59% of staff reported working unpaid overtime
each week. People that are charged for attending A&E with
non-life threatening ailment would minimize the visits from patients with
non-life threatening ailment to A&E and save resources for those in need of
emergency or urgent care. According to choose well Manchester (2010), in the area
of North West of England alone, the in appropriate  use of Emergency department  cost the NHS around about £21 million, while
each visit to the emergency department can cost £124 just to be attended to. Guttmann,
N., Nelson, S.CM. And. Zimmerman, D.R, (2001) also states that It is calculated
that a little bit over  half of children
and adolescence hospital Accident and emergency department visits are medically
non urgent.Health inequality Is the major point of argument
here, A health inequality is a specific type of difference in health (or in the
most vital impacts on health) that could possibly be shaped by policies (Guy,
et al., 2009). The first point of argument is that Fees should be demanded for
non-life threatening ailment visits to A&E because it will help reduce the
amount of people visiting the A&E for non-life threatening ailment.Counter Argument for this point is that Fees should
not be demanded for non-life threatening ailment visits to A&E because If
fees are charged for visiting A&E for non-life threatening ailment, it will
prevent people from accessing A&E and create health inequalities. Gregory,
A.(2014) states that the RCGP’s Dr Helen Stokes-Lampard said: “It would
put us on the slippery slope to the Americanisation of care, where only those
who can afford it get it.” The DoH said: “Charging patients goes
against the founding principles of the NHS.” Income is another Very vital factor that
influences on the health inequalities mention in the above, because if people
are charged, people on low income will suffer and become afraid to visit the
health service because of the charges and can in turn create a big gap between
how everyone access the health service and also the average living age between
the low income people in the society.Educating
people is a very vital part of helping people to make their choices on what
health service is available and how to access them, Education does not
only act on health, but also acts as an isolator in other factors.  So it is very important that people are well
informed on the different help available in the health service.  Education will be the second point of this
argument because the Lack of knowledge on health service
makes people visit the A for non-life threatening ailment, but sometimes People
are well informed about health services but still choose to visit A for non-life
threatening ailment. People often panic a lot when sick or in pains and this
can create a bit of confusion on what health service is available. NHS England
(2016), states that “Proof shows that only a portion of 999 calls are for sincerely
life threatening conditions, a lot patients attending A&E could be treated better
in other settings and people are most of the time unclear or confused about
what help is available when their General Practitioner surgery is closed”The waiting times for people in A get longer
because of people with non-life threatening ailment attending A. According
to the NHS England (2015), the objective time for patients to wait in the Emergency
department is at the moment aim to four hours from when the patient arrivals to
when admission, transfer or discharge occurs. Nevertheless, not all hospitals
have the urgent care centres related to each patient care needs, which means
people with minor injuries may have to wait longer before they are attended to.The people visiting A for non-life threatening
ailment do not make the waiting times longer because Waiting times in A
are prioritised depending on how serious and life threatening the ailment is. According
to Armstrong, P.W., (2000) Currently if over half those still waiting to be
seen should be ranked as urgent and if the urgent patients are actually given the
priority, then a lot more than half of those registered on the waiting list
must initially have been thought to need urgent admission, and, in review, a
lot more of those who are already admitted may have well turn out to have been
urgent cases because the longer people have to wait for admission, the less
likely they are ever to be admitted.

Educating people on how to Access the health
services appropriately should be a priority, but however people should not be
charged for attending A regardless of whether it is a non-life threatening ailment or not because of the health
inequalities points made above and also because hen one visit A, the waiting
times to be seen is prioritised determining on how serious ones ailment is.
I would propose that People should not be charged for visiting A with
life threating ailment but rather “People should be educated and well informed
before visiting A&E or any Health Service”

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now